Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Equal spreading in TLC

Investigating a number of the TLC chromatographic systems, full separation often occurs in several cases. A question appears here: which system should be considered to be the best, if selectivity is similar? The intuitive answer is to choose the system in which the spots are most equally spaced between themselves (for example RF = 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 for 3 compounds).

The objective mathematical evaluation of equal-spreading can be done by calculating various CRFs (chromatographic response functions). Two of them – retention uniformity (RU) and retention distance (RD) were recently proposed as better alternative to earlier approaches.

Their main properties are:

  • They are a number in range 0 – 1. 0 means no separation, 1 means perfect equal-spreading.
  • They have similar distribution as a random variable regardless of number of investigated compounds.
  • RU is insensitive to non-separation of two compounds (equal RF values) or RF values equal to 0 or 1. RD is sensitive and equal to 0 in such cases. For example the Rf values (0,0.2,0.2,0.3) (two compounds not separated at 0.2 and one at the start ) result in RD equal to 0, but RU equal to 0.3609. When some distance from 0 and spots occurs, the value is larger, for example Rf values (0.1,0.2,0.25,0.3) give RD = 0.4835, RU = 0.4066.

If we denote a number of compounds separated as n, Rf values sorted in non-decreasing order as Rf (1…n), Rf0 = 0 and Rf(n+1) = 1, then RU is calculated from the following formula:

RU=16(n+1)n(2n+1)i=1n(RFiin+1)2

and the formula for RD is presented below:

RD=[(n+1)(n+1)i=0n(RF(i+1)RFi)]1n

How to compute them easily?

The computation in spreadsheets is not easy, it is better to compute them in numerical environments. In R and S-plus, following functions computes the criteria for one system from a vector of Rf values:

rd = function (x)
{
        x = sort(x)
        n = length(x)
        d = diff(c(0,x,1));
        pd = prod(d);
        rd = ((n+1)^(n+1)*pd)^(1/n);
        return(rd);
}
ru = function (x)
{
        x = sort(x)
        n = length(x)
        i = (1:n)/(n+1)
        s = sum((x-i)^2)
        ru = 1-sqrt( (6*(n+1)) / (n*(2*n+1)) * s );
        return(ru);

}

We can use then apply() to compute more values from a matrix.

Analogous functions for MATLAB/Octave can be written:

function res = rd(x)
        x = sort(x);
        n = length(x);
        d = diff([0 x 1]);
        pd = prod(d);
        res = ((n+1).^(n+1).*pd).^(1./n);
endfunction
function res = ru(x)
        x = sort(x);
        n = length(x);
        i = (1:n)./(n+1);
        s = sum((x-i).^2);
        res = 1-sqrt((6.*(n+1))./(n.*(2.*n+1)).*s);
endfunction

More information and discussion can be found in following paper: 10.1556/JPC.20.2007.1.4

The further investigation led to introduce 2D version of these criteria, useful in ranking of 2D TLC separations.

If we treat a chromatographic plane as an unit square, and the Rf values as x and y coordinates, the distance between two spots can be calculated in following way:

Di,j=(xixj)2+(yiyj)2

Now, we denote the distance to nearest spot (or a border, if nearer), as B:

Bi=min[Di,1,,Di,n,xi,(1xi),yi,(1yi)]

If we compute such values for all spots, the 2D RU and RD criteria can be computed in following way:

RD=φn(i=1nBi)1n

RU=φnni=1nBi=φni=1nBi

where phi means the golden ratio value (1.618).

We can use following functions for R/S-plus and Octave/MATLAB to combine TLC systems into pairs and evaluate the separation performance:

tlc2d = function (rf)
{
    n = nrow(rf)
    p = ncol(rf)
    ru = matrix(0, p, p)
    rd = matrix(0, p, p)
    for (i in 1:p) {
        for (j in i:p) {
            X = rf[, c(i, j)]
            dist = as.matrix(dist(X))
            diag(dist) = 1
            dist = rbind(dist, t(X))
            dist = rbind(dist, t(1 - X))
            mins = apply(dist, 2, min)
            rd[i, j] = prod(mins)^(1/n) * sqrt(n) * (1 + sqrt(5))/2
            ru[i, j] = sum(mins) * (1 + sqrt(5))/(2 * sqrt(n))
            ru[j, i] = ru[i, j]
            rd[j, i] = rd[i, j]
        }
    }
    return(list(rd = rd, ru = ru))
}
[
function [rd,ru] = tlc2d(rf)

[n,p] = size(rf);
ru = zeros(p,p);
rd = zeros(p,p);

for i = 1:p
 for j = i:p
	X = rf(:,[i j]);
	first = reshape(X,1,n,2);
        second = reshape(X,n,1,2);
	dists = sqrt(sum((first(ones(n,1),:,:) - second(:,ones(n,1),:)).^2,3));
	for k = 1:n
		dists(k,k) = 1;
	end
	dists = [dists ; X'];
	dists = [dists ; 1.-X'];
	mins = min(dists);
	rd(i,j) = sqrt(n).*(1+sqrt(5))./2 .* prod(mins).^(1/n);
	ru(i,j) = (1+sqrt(5))./(2.*sqrt(n)) .* sum(mins);
	rd(j,i) = rd(i,j); ru(j,i) = ru(i,j);
  end
end

end

The argument of the function is a matrix of RF values (rows corresponds to compounds, columns to systems). Two distance-like matrices are computed, one for RU values, another for RD, for all combinations between the systems.

If you use these criteria, cite following paper: 10.1556/AChrom.20.2008.3.2